Applied Digital builds AI Factories: purpose-built data-center campuses leased for fifteen years to AI hyperscalers. About 1.4 gigawatts of capacity is contracted for roughly $36 billion of base-term lease revenue. The buildings are being financed with debt, and the stock is priced on delivery. This report tests whether the contracts, the construction, and the balance sheet hold together.
The $36 billion of contracted lease revenue is real and signed. The question is execution: buildings must be delivered on schedule, and the debt that funds them must be serviced until rents ramp. Delivery is on track so far. Size any exposure with the balance sheet in mind.
Applied Digital builds AI Factories: purpose-built data-center campuses leased for fifteen years to AI hyperscalers. About 1.4 gigawatts of capacity is contracted for roughly $36 billion of base-term lease revenue. The buildings are financed with debt, and the stock is priced on delivery: the contracts must convert to buildings on schedule.
DalalBytes rates it Positive, high-risk, scoring 70/100. The $36 billion of contracted lease revenue is real and signed. The question is execution: buildings must be delivered on schedule, and the debt that funds them must be serviced until rents ramp. The 2029 base target is $41.50, from a $27.30 reference price (September 23, 2026 close).
| Question | What to watch |
|---|---|
| 1. Are the contracts real? | Yes: 15-year take-or-pay leases, the customer pays whether it uses the capacity or not. $36B over the base term. |
| 2. Can they build on time? | Polaris Forge 1 delivered its first 100 MW on schedule in November 2025. Each new RFS is the checkpoint. |
| 3. Can the balance sheet carry the build? | Long-term debt is about $5B against $1.7B of equity. The D balance-sheet grade is the core risk. |
| 4. Is customer concentration manageable? | CoreWeave plus two hyperscalers hold essentially the whole backlog. One cancellation hurts. |
| 5. What is $27.30 paying for? | About 12.9x trailing sales. The price assumes the contracted revenue converts. |
Applied Digital designs, builds, owns, and operates purpose-built data-center campuses it calls AI Factories. The business model is landlord economics for the AI boom: sign a long-term lease with a tenant that needs massive computing capacity, build the building to that tenant's specifications, then collect rent for about fifteen years.
The leases are take-or-pay: the customer pays the contracted rent whether it fills the building with servers or not. This is the crucial detail. Revenue is not a hope about AI demand; it is a signed obligation from investment-grade hyperscalers and CoreWeave, one of the largest AI cloud companies. The capacity is measured in critical IT load: the megawatts of power delivered directly to the computing equipment, the only capacity that earns rent.
The company began in 2021 as Applied Blockchain, co-founded by Wes Cummins (Chairman and CEO) and Jason Zhang (President). It rebranded as Applied Digital in 2022 and pivoted from cryptocurrency hosting to AI data centers. In May 2026 the historic GPU cloud-services business was separated as ChronoScale (Nasdaq: CHRN), with Applied Digital retaining about 96% ownership.
The economics are infrastructure economics, not software economics. Margins are decent, with adjusted EBITDA of $107.2M on $611.3M of fiscal 2026 revenue, but the buildings cost billions to construct before the first rent check arrives.
Fiscal 2026 ended May 31, 2026 with revenue of $611.3M, up 167% from the prior year. The fourth quarter alone delivered $258.7M, up 407%, as the first Polaris Forge 1 building began contributing. Adjusted EBITDA reached $107.2M for the year and $42.4M for the quarter. Adjusted net income was $36.1M. Net operating income, the property-level profit measure, was $90.4M.
The GAAP picture is different: a net loss of $249.2M for the year. The gap between adjusted and GAAP results comes from stock-based compensation, depreciation on the new buildings, and interest on the debt. The non-GAAP figures also exclude ChronoScale, the separated cloud business.
The balance sheet transformed in fiscal 2026. Long-term debt went from $677.8M to $4,959.5M, roughly $5B. Cash and equivalents rose to about $4B. Total equity stands at about $1.72B, with 287.9M common shares outstanding. Debt to equity is about 2.9x.
The financings came in waves: $2.15B of 6.75% senior secured notes due 2031 issued at 98% of par, another $1.59B of senior secured notes, a revolving credit facility committed at $430M, and a $5B preferred-equity facility from Macquarie Asset Management. The debt is project-level and secured by the campuses and their leases, which is standard for infrastructure, but the quantum is large relative to the equity beneath it.
The honest read: this is how infrastructure gets built. Nobody funds $36B of contracted revenue with retained earnings. But the leverage means there is no cushion. Interest must be paid whether buildings deliver on time or not, and refinancing risk arrives with the 2031 maturities. The balance-sheet grade is D because the equity is thin and the debt is not.
| Campus | Tenant | Leased | Term | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polaris Forge 1, Ellendale ND | CoreWeave | 400 MW | ~15 yr | ~$11B |
| Polaris Forge 2, Harwood ND | US investment-grade hyperscaler | 200 MW | ~15 yr | ~$5B |
| Delta Forge 1, Boyce LA | US investment-grade hyperscaler | 300 MW | ~15 yr | ~$7.5B |
| Polaris Forge 3, North Dakota | Same hyperscaler | 300 MW | ~15 yr | ~$7.5B |
The three hyperscaler leases alone total 810 MW and about $20.2B of base-term revenue. CoreWeave also holds an option on another 150 MW at Ellendale, and the Polaris Forge 2 hyperscaler holds a right of first refusal on 800 MW more, the full 1 GW expansion of that campus.
The math that matters: $36B of base-term revenue across 1.4 GW over about 15 years works out to roughly $1.7M of revenue per MW per year. That is the unit economics the whole investment case rests on, and it is consistent with the expanded CoreWeave lease: $11B over 15 years on 400 MW is about $1.8M per MW per year. The base-case FY2029 scenario in this report assumes $1.57M per MW per year, slightly below the contracted rate, which is a deliberate cushion.
In data-center development, the only credential that matters is delivering buildings on the promised date. Applied Digital's record, so far, is clean.
The engineering pitch: closed-loop liquid cooling, near-zero water consumption, a projected PUE of 1.18, and 12 to 14 month build cycles. PUE, power usage effectiveness, is the ratio of total facility power to the power reaching the computers; 1.0 is perfect, so 1.18 is efficient. Speed is the selling point: in an industry where hyperscalers wait years for capacity, delivering a 100 MW building in about a year is the moat.
Applied Digital sits in the neocloud pack: specialist AI infrastructure companies building GPU-ready capacity faster than the big clouds. The pack trades on contracted growth, and the multiples are rich across the board.
| Company | Market cap | Valuation read | Contracted signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoreWeave | ~$58B | ~5x forward sales | $99.4B revenue backlog |
| Nebius | ~$58B | ~17x forward sales | Rapid growth, thinner backlog disclosure |
| IREN | ~$17-19B | High, loss-making | $9.7B Microsoft deal; 4.5+ GW pipeline |
| TeraWulf / Cipher | Smaller | Very high sales multiples | Loss-making, earlier stage |
| Applied Digital | ~$7.9B | ~12.9x trailing sales | $36B contracted, 1.4 GW |
Market caps and multiples per Finnhub and industry coverage, June to September 2026. CoreWeave and Nebius figures per ainvest, June 2026. IREN's Microsoft deal per Reuters, November 2025.
Applied Digital's relative position is interesting: it is the cheapest name in the pack on a contracted-revenue basis, roughly $7.9B of market value against $36B of signed base-term revenue. The discount reflects the earlier stage of delivery and the leverage. CoreWeave is both its biggest customer and its biggest comparable: if CoreWeave sneezes, Applied Digital catches it twice, as tenant and as valuation anchor.
The NVIDIA relationship has two chapters. In September 2024, NVIDIA invested $160M in Applied Digital through a private placement, becoming a visible strategic backer. Then, in its 13F filing released February 18, 2026, NVIDIA disclosed it had sold its entire 7,716,050-share stake during the fourth quarter of 2025, a position worth about $177M at year end. The stock fell 8.4% in after-hours trading and closed down 4.9% the next session.
Three facts keep this in proportion. First, the same filing showed NVIDIA also exiting Arm Holdings and WeRide while opening new positions in Intel, Nokia, and Synopsys: a portfolio rebalancing, not a targeted vote against Applied Digital. Second, NVIDIA deepened its commitment to CoreWeave with a $2B investment, which is the tenant that matters most to Applied Digital's revenue. Third, Applied Digital remains an NVIDIA Cloud Partner and builds its campuses around NVIDIA GPUs; the commercial relationship continues.
Data through the September 23, 2026 session. Reference price: $27.30. All indicators below use this single dated series.
| Indicator | Reading | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Price vs. 20-day average | $27.30 vs. $26.27 | Short-term momentum is positive; buyers are active this week. |
| Price vs. 50-day average | $27.30 vs. $27.66 | Price is pressing against medium-term resistance from below. |
| Price vs. 200-day average | $27.30 vs. $32.27 | The long-term trend is down: the stock sits about 15% below its 200-day. |
| 52-week range | $19.01 to $50.73 | The stock is 46% below its high, 44% above its low: the lower middle of the range. |
| 5-day / 21-day returns | +12.8% / +2.3% | A sharp one-week bounce inside a flat month. |
| 63-day return | -34.4% | The last three months were a real drawdown, not noise. |
| 126-day / 252-day returns | +2.7% / +12.6% | Flat over six months, modestly up over the year. |
| RSI (14) | 51.1 | Neutral. Neither overbought nor oversold. |
Support and resistance. $23.39 is the near support level, then $19, the 52-week low. Overhead: $29.10 is the recent swing high, then the 50-day at $27.66 as a dynamic ceiling, then the 200-day at $32.27 as the line the bulls must reclaim. $50.73, the 52-week high, is a distant ceiling.
The read. This is a basing chart, not a trending chart. The 34% three-month drawdown flushed weak holders; the 12.8% five-day bounce shows buyers returning. But every rally since spring has failed at the declining 200-day average. The technical grade is C+ because the structure is repairing, not repaired.
| Risk | Severity | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Execution and delivery delays | High | The thesis requires delivering about 1.3 GW more by 2027 on a fixed schedule. One on-time 100 MW building is encouraging, not proof at scale. Delays push revenue out while interest keeps accruing. |
| Leverage and refinancing | High | About $5B of long-term debt on $1.7B of equity, a 2.9x debt-to-equity ratio. The 2031 notes must eventually be refinanced; rates and credit conditions then are unknowable now. |
| Customer concentration | High | CoreWeave plus two hyperscalers hold essentially the entire $36B backlog. A single cancellation or renegotiation would impair the whole investment case. |
| Dilution history | Medium | Common shares outstanding grew from about 225M to 287.9M in one fiscal year alone. More equity raises would dilute existing holders, especially any raise below book value. |
| AI capex cycle risk | Medium | Take-or-pay leases protect revenue for fifteen years, but they do not protect the next round of leases. If hyperscaler AI spending slows, the pipeline beyond the contracted 1.4 GW shrinks. |
| Power and interconnection | Medium | Data centers live or die on grid power. Interconnection delays or rising energy costs in North Dakota and Louisiana would hit schedules and margins. |
| NVIDIA exit overhang | Low | The February 2026 exit was portfolio rebalancing, but it left a sentiment overhang and removed a prestigious holder. Headline risk, not fundamental risk. |
| Interest rates | Medium | Project debt reprices with rates. Higher-for-longer rates raise the cost of every future campus. |
| Catalyst | Timing | What good looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Building deliveries (RFS milestones) | Ongoing through 2027 | Each on-time RFS converts contracted MW into recognized revenue and de-risks the execution story. |
| New lease signings | Ongoing | More 15-year take-or-pay leases, especially the 150 MW CoreWeave option and the 800 MW Polaris Forge 2 right of first refusal. |
| ChronoScale value crystallization | Ongoing | The separated GPU cloud business (Nasdaq: CHRN), 96% owned, becomes a visible, valued asset rather than a footnote. |
| Operating cash flow inflection | FY27-FY28 | OCF, about $90M in the latest quarter, grows toward covering interest and then capex. Positive free cash flow ends the dilution debate. |
| De-levering | FY27-FY28 | Debt-to-equity falls as retained cash flow builds equity and project debt amortizes. |
| Fiscal Q1 2027 earnings | October 8, 2026 | Continued triple-digit revenue growth with progress on Polaris Forge 2 energization. |
| Analyst coverage | Ongoing | Wells Fargo initiated at Overweight with a $50 target on September 17, 2026; consensus target is about $63. Coverage breadth supports the re-rating if deliveries land. |
At $27.30, Applied Digital trades at about 12.9 times trailing-twelve-month revenue of $611.3M, on a market cap near $7.9B. On enterprise value, about $8.7B after adding roughly $0.8B of net debt, the multiple is about 14 times trailing revenue.
Is that expensive? Against the neocloud pack, it is the middle of the range: CoreWeave trades near 5x forward sales with a $99.4B backlog, Nebius near 17x forward sales, and earlier-stage names higher still. The market is not pricing Applied Digital as a software company; it is pricing it as contracted infrastructure trading at a discount for delivery risk and leverage.
The right way to think about the price is as a claim on the $36B. At $7.9B of market value, the market is paying about 22 cents for each contracted dollar of base-term revenue. That looks cheap until you remember the dollars arrive over fifteen years, the buildings are not all built, and the debt gets paid first.
| Bear | Base | Bull | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY29 revenue | $1.3B | $2.2B | $3.2B |
| EV/Sales multiple | 6x | 8x | 10x |
| Enterprise value | $1.3B x 6 = $7.8B | $2.2B x 8 = $17.6B | $3.2B x 10 = $32.0B |
| Less: net debt | - $4.5B | - $3.5B | - $3.0B |
| Equity value | $3.3B | $14.1B | $29.0B |
| Diluted shares | 350M | 340M | 330M |
| FY29 price target | $9.50 | $41.50 | $88.00 |
| Return from $27.30 | -65% | +52% | +222% |
Base case. The contracted 1.4 GW is substantially online by FY2029 at $2.2B of revenue, which is $1.57M per MW per year, slightly below the contracted $1.7M ($36B over 1.4 GW over 15 years), so the revenue carries a cushion. 8x EV/Sales sits between CoreWeave (~5x) and Nebius (~17x) forward multiples. Net debt falls to $3.5B as cash flow funds construction. Check the division: $3.3B / 350M = $9.43; $14.1B / 340M = $41.47; $29.0B / 330M = $87.88. Bear case. Deliveries slip, revenue reaches $1.3B, the market pays 6x for a levered developer that missed schedule, and $9.50 follows. Bull case. The pipeline converts beyond 1.4 GW, revenue hits $3.2B at 10x, and $88.00 follows.
Wes Cummins, Chairman and CEO, co-founded the company in 2021 with President Jason Zhang. Cummins led the pivot from cryptocurrency hosting to AI data centers and the rebrand to Applied Digital, then the separation of the cloud business as ChronoScale. The operating record under his leadership includes the CoreWeave leases, the two hyperscaler leases, the Macquarie financing, and the on-time delivery of the first 100 MW building.
The governance record carries one disclosed blemish. In a June 2023 8-K, the company's Audit Committee reported it had investigated a threatened, but never formally asserted, allegation of sexual harassment by Chief Marketing Officer Regina Ingel, arising from a personal relationship with Cummins. The Committee found the relationship consensual and the allegations unfounded, and the board reaffirmed Cummins as CEO. The stock fell about 16% to $8.09 on the disclosure. Short-seller reports and class-action filings followed in July 2023.
The honest assessment: the business execution since 2023 has been strong, and the board's process was disclosed rather than buried. But the episode, the short reports, and the dilution history mean governance deserves a permanent watch item. This is part of what the D balance-sheet grade and the 70/100 score are pricing in.
Applied Digital has what most AI infrastructure stories lack: signed, take-or-pay contracts. About 1.4 GW of capacity is leased for roughly $36B of base-term revenue from CoreWeave and two investment-grade hyperscalers, and the first 100 MW building was delivered on schedule in November 2025. The stock at $27.30 pays about 22 cents per contracted revenue dollar, a discount that reflects two genuine risks: the buildings must be delivered on borrowed money by 2027, and the balance sheet carries about $5B of debt on thin equity. The base case to $41.50 by FY2029 assumes the contracted capacity comes online at economics slightly below the signed rates. The bear case to $9.50 is what delivery failure plus leverage looks like. This is a positive, high-risk thesis: contracted growth, levered balance sheet, execution as the entire game.
Method. This report uses only information available through September 23, 2026. Financial figures come from Applied Digital press releases and SEC filings. Market data comes from Finnhub daily candles through the September 23, 2026 session. Scenario targets are illustrative models, not forecasts: scenario revenue times a scenario EV/Sales multiple, minus scenario net debt, divided by scenario shares.
| Claim | Source |
|---|---|
| FY2026: $611.3M revenue (+167%), Q4 $258.7M (+407%), adj. EBITDA $107.2M / $42.4M, adj. net income $36.1M, GAAP net loss $249.2M, NOI $90.4M | APLD FY2026 release, July 27, 2026 |
| 1.4 GW contracted, ~$36B base-term revenue; three hyperscaler leases 810 MW / ~$20.2B; ChronoScale split, ~96% retained | APLD FY2026 release, July 27, 2026 |
| Balance sheet: $4,959.5M long-term debt, 287.9M shares, $1,717.5M equity; cash $3,973M | APLD FY2026 10-K, July 29, 2026 |
| OCF $89.7M, investing -$2.94B, FCF -$2.78B, end cash $4.15B | AlphaQuery quarterly fundamentals, Q4 FY2026 |
| CoreWeave expansion to 400 MW / ~$11B, August 2025; path beyond 1 GW | Applied Digital expansion announcement, August 2025 (reported via ainvest.com) |
| Polaris Forge 2: 200 MW, ~15 yr, ~$5B; ROFR on 800 MW; PUE 1.18; ground Sept. 2025 | APLD release, October 22, 2025 |
| Delta Forge 1: 300 MW, ~15 yr, ~$7.5B, Boyce LA; Polaris Forge 3: 300 MW, ~$7.5B; ops 2027 | APLD FY2026 release, July 27, 2026 |
| First 100 MW: Phase I Oct. 2025, Phase II RFS Nov. 24, 2025, on time | APLD release, November 24, 2025 |
| $2.15B 6.75% notes due 2031; $1.59B notes; $430M revolver | APLD FY2026 release, July 27, 2026 |
| $5B Macquarie preferred facility | Bisnow, January 2025 |
| NVIDIA $160M placement Sept. 2024; sold 7,716,050 shares Q4 2025 (~$177M); 13F Feb. 18, 2026; -8.4% after hours | Company release; 13F coverage, Feb. 2026 |
| Founded 2021 by Wes Cummins and Jason Zhang as Applied Blockchain; rebranded 2022 | Company disclosures |
| June 2023 8-K investigation; unfounded; board reaffirmed CEO; -16% to $8.09; July 2023 short reports, class actions | APLD 8-K, June 23, 2023; law-firm filings |
| Price, volume, moving averages, returns | Finnhub daily candles, Sept. 2025 to Sept. 23, 2026 |
| 52-week range $19.01-$50.73; reference $27.30 | Finnhub; Sept. 23, 2026 session |
| CoreWeave ~$58B / ~5x fwd sales / $99.4B backlog; Nebius ~$58B / ~17x fwd sales | ainvest, June 2026 |
| IREN: $9.7B Microsoft deal; 4.5+ GW pipeline; ~$17-19B mcap | Reuters, Nov. 2025; Finnhub |
| FY2028 revenue projection $1.45B; Wells Fargo OW $50; consensus ~$63 | Motley Fool, Sept. 17, 2026; MarketBeat, Sept. 2026 |
| Fiscal Q1 2027 earnings October 8, 2026 | Market calendar data, Sept. 2026 |
Disclaimer: This report is independent research for informational purposes only. It is not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.